February 18, 2008

Dump the Charity Point


(this picture has nothing to do with hockey, but is pretty awesome)

The charity point. That's what many pundits refer to the one point teams get when they lose in either overtime or a shootout. The NHL's Competition Committee gathered after the lockout and decided that awarding teams that made it overtime or shootouts deserved at least one point. Bollacks! Why do they deserve a point for just getting to overtime? When did the NHL turn into a game show and award "parting gifts"? By this logic, teams that lose in four overtimes during the playoffs should force a best-of-9 series rather than 7, because, well, they played a bit longer.

I'm very happy that the league got rid of ties and every game has a winner. Whether it's in regulation, overtime, or the shootout. There was nothing worse than investing 2-3 hours of your life into a game only to have the outcome end with no winner. Nowadays, even if your team loses in overtime or a shootout, you still gain a point in the standings. Sure, it helps your favorite team in the standings, but other teams gaining these points could also hurt your team down the road.

Dave Caldwell of the NY Times has a good article today about the charity point and how many teams play it safe come the third period of tight games in order to salvage at least one point for their efforts.

"Statistics suggests that teams are indeed playing it safe, especially later in the season. In each of the past several seasons, the percentage of games tied after 60 minutes has increased significantly in the late stages of the schedule.

Over the first third of the current season, 73 of 410 games (17.8 percent) went to overtime and beyond. That number increased to 93 over the second 410 games (22.7 percent). And the rate of games tied after regulation has accelerated still more in the final third: after 54 games, 15 had reached overtime (27.8 percent)."


If the league is looking to open up the game and make it more exciting, wouldn't getting rid of the charity point fit right in? Rather than watching two teams play safe hockey in the third period, it'd be an all out battle for the two points. With the standings as tight as they are, the second half of the season could be giving us fans some pretty intense and exciting games with playoff implications every night. Who wouldn't want that?

The NHL standings without the bonus point (as of February 18th). You can compare this with the actual standings as of today (NHL standings)

EASTERN CONFERENCE
Ottawa 68
New Jersey 65
Carolina 60
Pittsburgh 66
Montreal 64
NY Rangers 60
Philadelphia 60
(tie) Boston 58
Atlanta 58
---------
Buffalo 56
Washington 56
NY Islanders 54
Florida 54
Tampa Bay 50
Toronto 48

WESTERN CONFERENCE
Detroit 82
Dallas 74
Minnesota 68
Anaheim 66
San Jose 62
Nashville 62
Colorado 60
Phoenix 60
---------
Vancouver 58
Calgary 58
St. Louis 54
Columbus 54
Chicago 54
Edmonton 54
Los Angeles 50

-Atlanta would actually be on the verge of a playoff berth

-Phoenix/Colorado would vault Calgary/Vancouver for playoff spots

-As of now, not a whole lot of change in regards to seedings within the conference. Some teams would move ahead of others, but a few do have games in hand on their standings neighbors.

-The Southeast Division leader would have a rightful place in the playoffs.

-Toronto...still sucking.

Ballhype: hype it up!

No comments: